A competitor has the page, and you don't
When Google's AI named a firm in our research, it was usually a firm with a page about that exact situation. A practice-area page that lists everything you do gives the AI very little to match.
GEO is the work of getting your firm named in AI answers. We ask the AIs the questions your clients actually ask, build a page for each situation your firm handles, and ask again every month to see what changed.
I'm Joshua David Little. I've run my own consulting firm since 2004, I've helped attorneys prepare complex cases for trial, and I ran the first family-law ad on ChatGPT, before the platform allowed legal-services ads.
More and more people open ChatGPT and describe their situation in detail. They have three kids, they own a home, they run a business. The answer can look past the best-reviewed lawyers in town for firms that deal with those specific things. That's what I call Context Marketing: building your marketing around the situations people are actually in, so the person searching and the AI recommending can both see that your firm fits.
When Google's AI named a firm in our research, it was usually a firm with a page about that exact situation. A practice-area page that lists everything you do gives the AI very little to match.
ChatGPT told people to look for a lawyer with experience in their exact kind of case, and to find out who would personally handle it. If your firm has nurses on staff, a physician-attorney, or a certified elder-law attorney, and your site doesn't say so, the AI has nothing to go on.
A page with an outdated law, a changed figure, or a lawyer who left years ago can be repeated as fact, under your firm's name.
Most firm owners don't know whether ChatGPT or Google's AI names them, and more of their clients may be asking one first. In one legal software company's 2025 research, more than half of legal consumers had used AI, or would consider using it, to answer a legal question.¹
If you've heard "GEO" or "AI visibility" in an agency pitch, ask two questions. What did they test before they sold it to you, and how will they count the cases it brings in?
In your city and in the words your clients use, one question per conversation, in ChatGPT, Google's AI, and Gemini. We record which firms get named and the reasons each answer gives.
The situations your firm handles and wants more of, each written for the person in it, answering their question in their own words.
Who will handle the case, what they've done in cases like it, and any certification they hold. If the AI tells families to look for something your firm has, your pages should say so plainly.
We go through your existing pages for old laws, old figures, and old team members, and fix them before an AI repeats them to someone deciding whether to call you.
Your Google Business Profile, legal directories, review sites, articles, interviews, and social profiles are all places an AI can draw from. Each one should tell the same specific story about the work your firm does and the people it does it for.
A "How did you hear about us?" question on your contact form, with ChatGPT and other AI tools listed, so the people who found you through an AI answer get counted all the way to the signed client.
The same questions, in the same AIs, every month. You get a report of who was named and why, and what changed since the last one.
"AI visibility" sold as a bundle of tactics, with nothing checked before and nothing counted after.
Your clients' own questions put to the AIs, pages built for the situations behind them, the same questions asked again every month, and the cases traced back to their source.
The pages GEO builds are the same pages that bring people in from search and give your ads somewhere useful to land. Each one leads to a resource, so a person who arrives from an AI answer can sign up, get help, and hear from you while they decide. As your Fractional CMO, I choose which situations come first, and the monthly report tells us what to build next.
In family law, ChatGPT and Google's AI rarely agreed. In the three markets where both named family firms, they didn't name a single firm in common, so a firm has to be findable by each.
ChatGPT left out the national advertisers that Google's answers put forward. If your firm already pays an agency for AI visibility, I can be the second opinion on what it's selling.
This is where ChatGPT and Google's AI agreed most. In Phoenix, Seattle, Boise, and Charlotte, most of the firms ChatGPT named were on Google's list too.
If your firm has a Certified Elder Law Attorney, one of over 500 nationwide according to the National Elder Law Foundation, every relevant page should say so. Families searching for help with a parent are usually the adult children, so write for them.
ChatGPT named a firm for nearly every business and estate question we asked. For estate questions it told people to have a CPA or financial advisor working beside the lawyer, and Google's AI gave the same advice for business questions, so pages that show how your firm works with those professionals fit what the AI is telling people.
Pages that answer "Do I qualify?" and "Is this lawsuit real?" for your firm's own cases.
We asked Google's AI the questions people ask about their own situations. When it named a firm, it was usually one with a page about that exact situation, sometimes over firms with far more reviews.
We then put the same situations to ChatGPT. In estate, malpractice, and serious-injury questions, it often named firms for their own pages on the person's situation. It often played reviews down, too, telling people that the attorney's experience with cases like theirs counts for more than a prestigious name or a pile of reviews.
The situation pages GEO builds lead to the same resources and follow-up our clients run on every channel.
New clients at about $200 each, with leads at about $21.
Over 20% of the people who clicked it signed up for the free resource it offered.
We ask ChatGPT, Google's AI, and Gemini the questions your clients ask, in your city, one question per conversation. We record who's named and the reasons each answer gives, then look for the pattern across many questions.
Mostly not. In family law, in the three markets where both named firms, they had none in common. Medical malpractice was the exception, where the two agreed on most of the firms they named.
They help on the map. In our research, ChatGPT often played reviews down and told people to look for experience with their exact kind of case.
Prices are one more thing an AI can use in its answer. When someone asks what a lawyer costs, a firm whose site says plainly what its work costs gives the answer something to cite.
It's a file some sites add to guide AI tools. We haven't seen evidence that it changes what the AI says, so we start with the pages.
Two ways. Your contact form asks how each person heard about you, with AI listed as an option, and we follow those people to the signed client. And the monthly report shows whether your firm is being named, and what changed.
¹ Clio, a legal software company, Legal Trends Report, 2025: "More than half of consumers have used or would consider using AI to answer a legal question."
A 45-minute to one-hour video call with me. Before we meet, I check whether ChatGPT and Google's AI name your firm when someone describes the situations you handle. Then we map your firm's marketing together on a whiteboard, and you keep the map whether or not we work together.
Currently accepting a limited number of Fractional CMO relationships.